DATAB overestimating person-years?
Quote from Deleted user on 01/18/2024, 2:34 pmI’ve run DATAB to get person-tables over the period Jan 1, 1999 through Dec 31, 2012, a period of 14 total years. After loading the grouped dataset in AMFIT, Epicure’s estimate of mean person-years is 15.7 years, which is more than the total number of possible years per person. Does this seem reasonable given binned person-time averaging, or does this imply user error?
Thanks!
I’ve run DATAB to get person-tables over the period Jan 1, 1999 through Dec 31, 2012, a period of 14 total years. After loading the grouped dataset in AMFIT, Epicure’s estimate of mean person-years is 15.7 years, which is more than the total number of possible years per person. Does this seem reasonable given binned person-time averaging, or does this imply user error?
Thanks!
Quote from Eric Grant on 02/07/2024, 5:53 pmHi Cato,
Doesn’t sound right by the quick description. Can you send the datab script and log to info@hirosoft.com? Let’s start with the syntax and make sure that the start/stop dates are properly defined. Please include the output from your mean statement as well as a ‘mean’ statement for all time variables.
Thanks!
Eric
Hi Cato,
Doesn’t sound right by the quick description. Can you send the datab script and log to info@hirosoft.com? Let’s start with the syntax and make sure that the start/stop dates are properly defined. Please include the output from your mean statement as well as a ‘mean’ statement for all time variables.
Thanks!
Eric
Quote from Eric Grant on 10/10/2024, 4:03 pmThis issue was closed off line and was traced to a syntax error.
If others have trouble with their DATAB scripts, let us know and we’ll try and figure out the difficulty.
Thanks, Cato, for the question!
This issue was closed off line and was traced to a syntax error.
If others have trouble with their DATAB scripts, let us know and we’ll try and figure out the difficulty.
Thanks, Cato, for the question!
